The IPKat is delighted to learn that the Kingdom of Morocco has deposited its instrument of accession to the International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants. The Convention will enter into force for Morocco on 8 October 2006, when the Kingdom becomes a member of the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV).
Left: Moroccan sea holly
Moroccan plant life here and here The Road to Morocco here
The Chinese Opportunity
The Intellectual Property Institute, London, is holding an exciting afternoon seminar, hosted by law firm Linklaters, on 12 October 2006. Chaired by IPI president Ian Harvey, the seminar features the following attractions:
* Kevin Rivette (Vice-President for IP Strategy, of IBM Corporation) speaks on the "Opportunity, Pitfalls and Enthusiasm";
* Luke Minford (Rouse & Co. International) examines the myths and the reality of the Chinese IP landscape and what it means in business terms;
* Jiang Zhipei (Chief Justice and Director of the IP Tribunal) will be putting the Chinese government's side of the subject;
* GE Vice-President Todd Dickinson - a former Commissioner of the USPTO - will be relating his own company's experiences there.
Above: the spectacular results of some early Chinese human cloning experiments
The IPKat says, don't miss this event. Kevin Rivette is co-author of Rembrandts in the Attic - he's obviously full of ideas and it would be a pity to miss out on his take on IP/China.
UPOV IS MOROCCO-BOUND; THE CHINESE OPPORTUNITY
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Thursday, September 21, 2006
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html